The sigh of the search for knowledge.– “Oh, my greed! There is no selflessness in my soul but only an all-coveting self that would like to appropriate many individuals as so many additional pairs of eyes and hands–a self that would like to bring back the whole past, too, and that will not lose anything that it could possibly possess. Oh, my greed is a flame! Oh, that I might be reborn in a hundred beings!” –Whoever does not know this sigh from firsthand experience does not know the passion of the search for knowledge.
Sandra Harding will be speaking in Oxford on Feminist Standpoint Epistemology, Objectivity and Diversity in Oxford on 4th and 5th May.
Everyone is welcome, but Sandra would particularly like to meet and engage with postgrads and ECRs.
5.00 Thursday 4th May, Examination Schools, University of Oxford
Public lecture: ‘After Mr. Nowhere: New Proper Philosophic Selfs?’
The lecture will expand on the themes in the last chapter of her Objectivity and Diversity.
Abstract: Contemporary analytic philosophy has modeled itself on distinctive characteristics of modern Western sciences: in its initial formulations, it was to be a “scientific philosophy.” Its objectivity, and thus its intellectual and social value, was defined in terms of its freedom from social and political values. Yet the new social movements emerging since the 1960’s, such as poor peoples’ movements, civil rights, feminist, anti-colonial, and many more, have developed methods of research, including in philosophy, that claim a stronger commitment to objectivity than the conventionally objective sciences and their philosophies ever could achieve, though they refuse the value-free understanding of how best to maximize objectivity. This presentation will identify and reflect on the different conceptions of the “proper philosophic self” created by the knowledge-production projects of these new social movements.
4.00 Friday 5th May, Harris Manchester College, Oxford
Panel session: Feminist Standpoint Epistemology
Sandra Harding in discussion with Beverley Clack, Liz Frazer, Sabina Lovibond, and Katherine Morris
Protest Camps and Beyond: Temporality, Informality, Memory and Care
Camps offer an increasingly visible form of housing and shelter in the contemporary world. Notionally temporary, camps seem to form a permanent social reality reflecting an increasingly permanent state of crisis of social reproduction globally. We witness, on the one hand, state and supra-state agencies employing camps as attempts to manage flows of migration and refuge, or in responses to natural disasters. On the other hand, camps emerge more autonomously, in defiance of the control associated with the managerial provision of care, and in response to the limits of state and supra-state care provision. Finally camps have become an ever more present social movement tactic, often explicitly addressing concerns of social reproduction.
Following Hailey’s (2009) typology camps can be cast as expressions of necessity, control and autonomy. In the context of the contemporary proliferation of camp architectures, it seems evidence that those three types of camps increasingly overlap. Protest camps, cast as autonomous expressions of political questionings of the status quo (Feigenbaum, Frenzel, & McCurdy, 2013) express concerns about a crisis of social reproduction. In recent years new protest camps have often focused on issues such as housing, but also addressed specifically the threats to life emerging from the continuous exploitation of natural resources. Protest camps form a site of contestation, but they also provide places in which sustainable and resilient alternatives are experimented with, created, and practiced. A key feature uniting many protest camps and other place-based protests is the politicisation of care. To the extent that camps produce forms of shelter and care, they also have to grapple with the challenges and contradictions of autonomous care provision.
In this one day seminar we want to approach the theme from three thematic angles:
1) Informality and Temporality
3) Care as resilience and resistance
We will have inputs and provocations followed by discussions on each of the themes, attempting to avoid the classical academic formats in order to achieve some productive movements and explore options for collaboration. We finish the day with a book launch and celebration of the recently published Protest Camps In International Context edited by Gavin Brown, Anna Feigenbaum, Fabian Frenzel and Patrick McCurdy.
10:00 Gathering (Refreshments available)
10:30 Informality and Temporality
13:30 Memory and Visibility
15:30 Care as Resilience and Resistance
17:00 Book Launch Celebration for Protest Camps in International Context
The seminar is free to attend but places are limited. Please register here.
Some travel busaries are available to participants. To apply pleased send an email to Fabian Frenzel ,Anna Feigenbaum or Gavin Brown explaining your interest in the seminar and possible contributions on the day. This could be, for example, a provocation (5 mins) based on research project or and proposal for a collaborative project.
Feigenbaum, A., Frenzel, F., & McCurdy, P. (2013). Protest Camps. London: Zed Books.
Hailey, C. (2009). Camps : a guide to 21st-century space. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
Berghahn Journals is pleased to announce that the latest issue of Focaal – Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology has been published.
In a special section titled “nonrecording states,”contributors explore why and when states knowingly refrain from recording people and their activities. This issue also features a general articles section and concludes with a forum and review article.
Please visit the Berghahn website for more information about the journal:
THEME SECTION: Nonrecording states
Guest Editors: Barak Kalir and Willem van Schendel
Nonrecording states between legibility and looking away
Barak Kalir and Willem van Schendel
The sanctioning state: Official permissiveness and prohibition in India
Non- and dedocumenting citizens in Romania: Nonrecording as a civil boundary
Nonrecording the “European refugee crisis” in Greece: Navigating through irregular bureaucracy
“China gives and China takes”: African traders and the nondocumenting states
State desertion and “out-of-procedure” asylum seekers in the Netherlands
Interiority and government of the child: Transparency, risk, and good governance in Indonesia
Neutrality in foreign aid: Shifting contexts, shifting meanings-examples from South Sudan
Anthropology at the dawn of apartheid: Radcliffe-Brown and Malinowski’s South African engagements, 1919-1934 Isak Niehaus
Race, space, secularism, and the writing of history
Recommend Focaal to your library
A form for this purpose is provided on the Focaal website: http://www.journals.berghahnbooks.com/focaal/library-recommendations/
Free Sample Issue
Just out: the latest issue of Justice Spatiale/Spatial Justice, guest edited by Béatrice Collignon and Irène Hirt, on Spatial Justice and Indigenous People.
It is freely accessible (and fully bilingual) here: http://www.jssj.org.
Philippe GERVAIS-LAMBONY | Frédéric DUFAUX | Aurélie QUENTIN
1. Claiming Space to Claim for Justice: the Indigenous Peoples‘ Geographical Agenda
Béatrice Collignon | Irène Hirt
2. Urban Protected Areas: Forces of justice or injustice for Indigenous popula-tions? The cases of Xochimilco and the national parks of Mumbai and Cape Town
Frédéric Landy | Nadia Belaidi | Karl-Heinz Gaudry Sada
3. Right to and on the City. The case of the American Indians of the San Francisco Bay Area
4. Spatial Justice and Indigenous Peoples’ Protection of Sacred Places: Adding Indigenous Dimensions to the Conversation
5. Land and indigenous territories in the Bolivian Amazon: full but imperfect spatial justice?
Laetitia Perrier Bruslé
6. Towards integrating Indigenous culture in urban form
Kara Puketapu-Dentice | Sean Connelly | Michelle Thompson-Fawcett
7. The indefensible in-betweenness or the spatio-legal arbitrariness of the Métis fact in Quebec
1. From the Innu of Quebec to the United Nations, via the Yanomami of Brazil: an eventful journey of collaboration
2. The Right to the Pekuakamiulnuatsh First Nation’s Territory
Irène Hirt | Caroline Desbiens
3. Indigenous Peoples and Spatial Justice. An Interview with Renee LOUIS PUALANI.
Beatrice Collignon | Irene Hirt
I recently tweeted a link to my article that is just out in Urban Geography. That piece is a commentary on Bob Lake’s plenary paper on Dewey and creative democracy at the AAG in San Francisco last year, and it is in a special issue/section of UG that also includes Bob’s paper on Dewey, Katherine Hankins’ excellent commentary on Bob’s paper, and then Bob’s response to the commentaries.
Call For Papers – Peak neoliberalism? Revisiting and rethinking the concept of neoliberalism
In the journal Ephemera. More Here.
Deadline for submissions: 30 June 2017
Ugo Rossi’s new book is out. You can read more about it here. There will also be an author meets critics session on this book at the AAG in Boston that I am looking forward to being a part of.
Published Today: Our Digital Rights to the City
Free to download (pdf, epub, mobi): http://meatspacepress.org/
‘Our Digital Rights to the City’ is a small collection of articles about digital technology, data and the city. It covers a range of topics relating to the political and economic power of technologies that are now almost inescapable within the urban environment. This includes discussions surrounding security, mapping, real estate, smartphone applications and the broader idea of a ‘right to the city’ in a post-digital world.
The collection is edited by Joe Shaw and Mark Graham and its contributing authors are Jathan Sadowski, Valentina Carraro, Bart Wissink, Desiree Fields, Kurt Iveson, Taylor Shelton, Sophia Drakopoulou and Mark Purcell.
Please follow us @meatspacepress
Join our mailing list at http://meatspacepress.org/
‘Our Digital Rights to the City’ also available free at:
* Free to download (epub, most e-readers): epub
* Free to download (pdf): pdf
* Free to download (mobi, for Kindle): mobi
* Free to read (pdf): Here
Gay Science, 321:
New caution.–Let us stop thinking so much about punishing, reproaching, and improving others! We rarely change an individual, and if we should succeed for once, something may also have been accomplished, unnoticed: we may have been changed by him. Let us rather see to it that our own influence on all that is yet to come balances and outweighs his influence. Let us not contend in a direct fight — and that is what all reproaching, punishing, and attempts to improve others amount to. Let us rather raise ourselves that much higher. Let us color our own example ever more brilliantly. Let our brilliance make them look dark. No, let us not become darker ourselves on their account, like all those who punish others and feel dissatisfied. Let us sooner step aside. Let us look away.